Friday, August 21, 2020

CODING GUIDANCE-INCISION AND DRAINAGE OF ABSCESS


CODING GUIDANCE-INCISION AND DRAINAGE OF ABSCESS

While the code descriptions reference single versus multiple, per the CPT Assistant, December 2006, Surgery: Integumentary System the Provider is the individual who determines whether the I&D is simple or complex if only one subcutaneous abscess was incised/drained.

For single subcutaneous abscesses, the presence or absence of packing does not clarify that the single abscess is “complicated” – the Provider will need to document if it is simple or complicated before 10061 can be assigned to a single subcutaneous abscess.

  • Without the Provider documentation that the single subcutaneous abscess is “complicated”, the correct code assignment is 10060.

Simple I&D of multiple subcutaneous lesions would be coded to 10061 (see also CPT Assistant 2005, p. 7, Incision and Drainage Abscess)

 

CPT 10060

  • Incision and drainage of abscess, carbuncle, suppurative hidranenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia – simple or single). One superficial abscess, or a single larger abscess.

CPT 10061 -

  • Incision and drainage of abscess, carbuncle, suppurative hidradenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia; complicated or multiple.

  • I&D of multiple abscess (simple, complicated or not specified). (See CPT Assistant, Aug 2017 – Surgery: Integumentary System & 2nd Q 2011 Coding Clinic for HCPCS -Incision and Drainage of Multiple Abscesses)

  • I&D of complicated abscess (single or multiple) that is larger and requires probing to break up loculations or involves packing. Spider bites tend to be larger, more complicated lesions that when incised and drained. (See 2nd Q 2017 Coding Clinic for HCPCS.

Complicated Incision and Drainage Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Second Quarter 2017: Page 4 Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after August 11, 2017, unless otherwise noted.


QUESTION 8 - A patient underwent an incision and drainage procedure at our facility. According to the operative report, an incision was made over the lesion and purulent material was expressed. Loculations were broken up using forceps and more of the material was expressed. The drainage cavity was then irrigated, packed and dressed with sterile gauze. 

Would it be appropriate to code an incision and drainage (I&D) as complicated based on documentation that a drain or packing was used? There are many articles available that provide varying opinions and we would appreciate an official response. Should the term complicated be documented or may the coder use the drain or packing as an indicator of a complicated procedure?


ANSWER No, it would be inappropriate for the coder to assume that the incision and drainage is complicated based on the use of a drain or packing without confirmation from the physician. When the documentation is unclear the coder should query the physician for clarification.  



Surgery: Integumentary System CPT Assistant, August 2017, Volume 27, Issue 8, page 9


Question: How should the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) code 10030, Image-guided fluid collection drainage by catheter (eg, abscess, hematoma, seroma, lymphocele, cyst), soft tissue (eg, extremity, abdominal wall, neck), percutaneous, be reported, ie, must the drainage catheter be left in place in order to report code 10030?


Answer: In order to report code 10030, the drainage catheter needs to be left in place and secured with a suture or alternative fixation device for post-procedure evacuation, and the patient sent to recovery. If a drain was not left in place for prolonged drainage, the procedure would be reported as an aspiration with code 10160, Puncture aspiration of abscess, hematoma, bulla, or cyst, rather than an abscess drainage.


Incision and Drainage of Multiple Abscesses Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Second Quarter 2011 Page: 8 Coding advice contained in this issue is effective with procedures/services provided after July 30, 2011 unless otherwise noted.

 

Question #8 - Patient presents to the emergency department for incision and drainage (I&D) of multiple abscesses. Purulent fluid was drained from the abscesses of the left quadriceps and the left lower quadrant, a moderate amount of fluid was drained from another area of the left lower quadrant and packed with iodoform gauze, and a small amount of fluid was drained from the left trapezius and packed with iodoform gauze. What is the correct code assignment for the I&D of these multiple abscesses? Would our facility report CPT code 10060 for each abscess drained? Or would we report 10061 once for all of the abscesses which were drained?

 

Answer - Assign CPT code 10061, Incision and drainage of abscess (e.g., carbuncle, suppurative hidradenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia); complicated or multiple, for I&D of the multiple abscesses. It would be inappropriate to assign 10060, Incision and drainage of abscess (e.g., carbuncle, suppurative hidradenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia); simple or single, for each abscess. 

Surgery: Integumentary System CPT Assistant April 2010, Volume 20, Issue 9, page 10

      

Question: Would it be correct to report CPT code 10060, Incision and drainage of abscess (eg, carbuncle, suppurative hidradenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia); simple or single, when a physician uses a needle to puncture an abscess that is allowed to drain by itself, without any incision or aspiration of the abscess into the syringe?

 

Answer: No. CPT code 10060, Incision and drainage of abscess (eg, carbuncle, suppurative hidradenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia); simple or single, includes both the incision and drainage of an abscess, therefore, it would not be appropriate to report this code because there was no incision involved.

Also, it would be inappropriate to report code 10160 (puncture aspiration of an abscess) since no aspiration was performed. If evaluation and management (E/M) services were rendered, such as services described in code 99211, this would be used to report the service. Report the appropriate E/M services based on the key components provided.



Surgery: Integumentary System CPT Assistant, December 2006, Volume 16, Issue 12, pages 14 - 15

 

Question: Many of the incision and drainage codes (ie, 10060-10140, 10180) include one code for simple procedures and one code for complicated procedures. Does the CPT code set define these terms?

 

AMA Comment: No. The choice of code is at the physician's discretion, based on the level of difficulty involved in the incision and drainage procedure.




Incision and Drainage Abscess CPT Assistant, Special Issue 2005,  page 7

 

Question: If an incision and drainage is performed for one abscess on the arm and one on the leg, would it be appropriate to report code 10060 two times? Or should code 10061 be reported one time?

 

AMA Comment: Many of the incision and drainage (I & D) procedures include one code for simple procedures and one code for complicated procedures; however, the terms simple and complicated are not defined in the CPT codebook.

Rather, the choice of code is at the physician's discretion, based on the level of difficulty involved in the incision and drainage procedure. It is important to note that code 10060, Incision and drainage of abscess (eg, carbuncle, suppurative hidradenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia); simple or single, should be reported for a simple or single I & D procedure.

 

Code 10061, Incision and drainage of abscess (eg, carbuncle, suppurative hidradenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia); complicated or multiple, should be reported for a complicated or multiple I & D procedure.  

CODING TIPTherefore, if simple I & D procedures are performed on multiple lesions, then the appropriate code is 10061.


CODING GUIDANCE-SPINAL HARDWARE INJECTION

 

CODING GUIDANCE-SPINAL HARDWARE INJECTION

Surgery: Nervous System

CPT Assistant, May 2012, Volume 22, Issue 5, page 14
 
Question:
 
What code(s) may be reported for injection of 0.5% Marcaine and 80 mg of Depo-Medrol to existing spinal hardware (eg, pedicle screws) at L4, L5, and S1 bilaterally? May code 64483 be reported?
 
Answer:
 
No. Code 64483, Injection, anesthetic agent and/or steroid, transforaminal epidural; lumbar or sacral, single level, represents transforaminal epidural nerve root injection performed in the lumbar region. There is no specific CPT code for the injection of spinal hardware. CPT code 64999, Unlisted procedure, nervous system, would be most appropriate to describe the injections for pain performed outside the foramen, as indicated in the clinical scenario provided in this inquiry. Although three spinal level (L4, L5, S1 bilaterally) injections were performed, code 64999 should be reported only once to represent the multiple injections.

Thursday, August 20, 2020

GENICULAR NERVE BLOCK AND ABLATION NEW CPT CODES AND GUIDELINES


Effective January 1, 2020. New CPT(64624 and 64454) added for nerve ablation and nerve injection.

ABLATION(eg, Chemical, Thermal, Electrical or Radiofrequency):
 
CPT 64624(Destruction by neurolytic agent, genicular nerve branches including imaging guidance, when performed)

Pay attention to this, the CPT 64624 requires the destruction of each of the following genicular nerve branches: (Make sure your Provider had documented this!)
Superolateral
Superomedial
Inferomedial

(Do not report 64624 in conjunction with 64454)

If destruction not done for all of the above 3 branches, then you can report CPT 64624 but you MUST append MODIFIER 52.

INJECTION(NERVE BLOCK):

When your Physician is Blocking the Knee Genicular Nerves - here's your code: (pay attention with the imaging! it is included!).

CPT 64454(Injection(s), anesthetic agent(s) and/or steroid; genicular nerve branches; including imaging guidance, when performed (Make sure your Provider had documented this!)

Superolateral
Superomedial
Inferomedial

(Do not report 64454 in conjunction with 64624).

If all 3 of these genicular nerve branches are not injected, then you can report CPT 64454 but you MUST append MODIFIER 52.


CODING GUIDANCE ON COVID-19 ICD-10-CM


1) The CARES Act does not require that COVID be the primary diagnosis. The particular payor 

we are having issues with website does state that COVID must be the primary diagnosis but that

imposes a requirement that is not contained in the CARES Act. Should the coder change their

coding based on this payor?

This question was addressed in the presentation, we agree with the AHIMA and AHA positions that

the coding should be done compliantly without question. We cannot or will not advise coders to

change the sequencing of the coding for any particular payor. If you are having issues with a

specific payor, you may want to consider an internal process in conjunction with your business

office. NJHA supports only compliant coding and following the Official Coding Guidelines.


2) We are having issues billing Medicaid for COVID testing. Can you offer any other insight that

might help us?

This question is similar to question 1, and the advice is still the same, we cannot or will not advise

coders to change the sequencing of the coding for any particular payor. If you are having issues

with a specific payor, you may want to consider an internal process in conjunction with your

business office. NJHA supports only compliant coding and following the Official Coding Guidelines.


3) If a COVID lab test is being done because patient has presented with a symptom like fever or

cough and the test is negative (and they indicate no known exposure) what COVID screening

code is used?

When a COVID lab test is being done because of symptoms and the test is negative, code the

symptoms as the Z20.828. See Guideline I.C.21.c.1, in a pandemic everyone is assumed to be

exposed.

4) If a patient is getting a covid test for the soul purpose of having surgery since it is required, 

would the code Z11.59 be the only code used or would code Z01818 be included? Of course, if it 

comesback positive, I would use U07.1.

If there is a script with a diagnosis on it, follow what the reason for the testing is, so if the script

notes “hernia”, then code the hernia followed by the Z11.59 for the screening. If the only reason is

Pre-admission testing – then code the Z01.818 followed by the Z11.59. Code your PAT encounters

the same as you would before COVID, and simply add the Z11.59 for the screening as a secondary

code.

5) If a patient has a COVID/SARS antigen test as an outpatient, no symptoms, what Z code is

recommended to use?

The antigen test is a diagnostic test for COVID, don’t confuse it with the antibody test. With that

being clarified, the Z20.828 should be assigned if the patient has a negative test, if the test is

positive then the U07.1 should be assigned.

6) When a previously positive covid patient is tested for discharge clearance and the results are

negative should we also code the screening test Z11.59?

In our experience, patients could be tested many times during an admission, depending on the

length of stay, it has not been our practice to assign a screening code during an inpatient stay.

Unless your facility codes screenings on inpatient encounter regularly, any testing during the

inpatient encounter would not be coded separately.

7) I have a question regarding the appropriate usage of Z11.59 versus Z20.828. When a patient

comes in for preadmission testing, we have been using Z11.59, but after your presentation

yesterday I thought I heard you indicate that we should be using Z20.828 as the pandemic had

been extended until October? Can you remind me who you said extended the Pandemic

timeframe? Do we not use Z11.59 during this time then at all as we are all considered to have

been exposed and then Z20.828 would be the only appropriate code? 

The Z11.59 is for PAT work only. The Z20.828 would be used for every other situation where there

is not a positive result. That advice was communicated via the AHIMA Engage Board, with a

person posting the advice they got from Coding Clinic. In the presentation we stated that the

health emergency declaration from HHS – which encompasses all of the waivers – was extended for

90 days – which lands in October. Only the WHO can declare the pandemic over – and we are sure

that information will come from the WHO and CDC at the appropriate time. If Coding Clinic

publishes other advice as to the assignment of Z11.59, then of course follow the updated Coding

Clinic advice.

8) Could you address what to code for patients who present with other conditions, but facility

protocol is to issue a COVID test prior to any admission or surgery. Results are negative. For

asymptomatic patients presenting for outpatient lab, what dx. Code are you assigning for this.

If patients are being tested in the ED prior to an unscheduled admission and the results are

negative the Z20.828 should be assigned. If a patient is being screened prior to a scheduled

procedure and has no known exposure, then the Z11.59 should be assigned.

9) During the pandemic is it assumed that everyone has a possible exposure to COVID, and we

should use the Z20.828 for hospital admissions when they give a COVID test to everyone, and

never use the Z03.818? I am still confused.

Correct, the Z03.818 should not be used during the pandemic, assign only the Z20.828 and follow

Guideline I.C.21.c.1, in a pandemic everyone is assumed to be exposed.

10) If a patient tested positive while in acute care setting and is now in Skilled bed for debility and

has negative test, how would this be coded?

The coder needs to establish whether the patient has recovered from the COVID infection or

whether they are dealing with the residuals of a current infection. If the patient has recovered

then assign the Z86.19, if the patient is still dealing with the infection, the U07.1 should still be

assigned. Do not assign a history of COVID code based on a negative test.

11) Does the following mean that we can code directly from the positive lab result regardless of 

what the provider documents or does the provider need to document the positive results?

 Code only confirmed cases: Code only a confirmed diagnosis of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease 

(COVID-19).asdocumented by the provider, documentation of a positive COVID-19 test result, or a 

presumptive positive COVID-19 test result. For a confirmed diagnosis, assign code U07.1, COVID-19. 

This is an exception to the hospital inpatient guideline Section II, H. In this context, “confirmation” 

does not require documentation of the type of test performed; the provider’s documentation that the 

individual has COVID-19 is sufficient.

Does the following only apply if the positive test results come back after discharge? We are unsure about

how to interpret the newly released COVID-19 guidelines in relation to the uncertain diagnosis guideline 

which refers to diagnoses “documented at the time of discharge” stated as possible, probable, etc. Can we

code these cases as confirmed COVID-19 if the test results don’t come back until a few days later and the

patient has already been discharged? (4/1/2020) Yes, if a test is performed during the visit or

hospitalization, but results come back after discharge positive for COVID-19, then it should be coded as

confirmed COVID-19.

The answer here is yes, if a test result comes back positive, the coder will assign the U07.1 without

having the provider document positive results. The only documentation the coder needs is that a

test was done, if the results are negative, code the Z20.828.

12) If a test was ordered but no test was performed due to a problem in handling, do we still 

assume exposure due to the pandemic or treat it as like no test.

Yes, assign the Z20.828. It is the same concept as an unsuccessful procedure, the specimen was

still taken, so it is no fault of the patient that the test did not get completed or produce a result.

13) What ICD-10-CM code would be recommended to be used for patients coming in requiring a

COVID test be done prior to air travel?

While this scenario seems similar to the PAT testing, the advice here would be to assign Z20.828 as

this testing is being done for possible exposure, rather than for screening for hospitalization. This

might be a good question to pose to Coding Clinic for further clarification.

14) We can code a positive Covid result without confirmation from provider? Can code from lab

result??

As stated in the coding guidelines for COVID-19 infections that went into effect on April 1, code

U07.1 may be assigned based on results of a positive test as well as when COVID19 is documented

by the provider. This is an exception to the rule about coding from test results and can only be

applied to COVID testing.

15) July 17, 2020 ICD10 Monitor put out an article talking about new guidelines that go in effec

t on Oct 1 2020 and that they advise that the use of the Z11.59 should be discontinued during the

pandemic and replaced with Z20.828. Your presentation stated to use the Z11.59 for pretesting.

Are you still suggesting we use the Z11.59 for pretesting? (the article can be found here:

https://www.icd10monitor.com/news-alert-fy-2021-icd-10-cm-guidelines-released-covid-19-coding-guidance-update)

The only advice we have seen from Coding Clinic and that was indirectly via the AHIMA Engage

Message Board was to assign the Z11.59 for PAT work only. Of course, if Coding Clinic publishes

different advice, our recommendation is always to follow the Official Coding Guidelines along with

the what is published by Coding Clinic at that time.

16) If a patient is admitted and going to a skilled nursing facility and has to be screened for covid

while they are here what diagnosis code should we be using?

17) What code is appropriate for coding an inpatient being screening for COVID before being

discharged to a nursing home, not the Z11,59? You would code the Z20.828?

This answer is for the two questions above, as they are similar. This could go many ways, it would

depend on the circumstances of the admission, if the patient was a COVID patient in the first place,

the COVID code whether it be U07.1 or Z20.828 would already be coded. If the COVID test has

nothing to do with the admission, then assign Z20.828 or U07.1 depending on the test results.

18) How to code a patient who had COVID last month was treated and is now asymptomatic BUT

 still testing positive for COVID. Do we code the U or the Z code?

The positive test shows active infection, so it would be appropriate to assign the U07.1 here.

19) My question is, a patient confirmed with COVID-19 10 days before now in this particular 

medical record, it is mentioned as patient is having signs and symptoms and not related to 

COVID-19confirmed is documented in Medical Record. So, in this case can we take that as 

suspected or confirmed COVID?

You have to be careful with the “suspected” here, remember only confirmed cases of COVID-19 can

be coded. If the patient is confirmed to have COVID 10 days prior, and the signs and symptoms

bringing the patient to the hospital are not COVID related, then the coder should query to see if the

patient still has an active COVID infection, or if the provider considers the COVID to be resolved. If

the patient still has active infection, the U07.1 should be assigned as a secondary diagnosis since it

was not the reason for admission, if the query response says resolved COVID, assign the Z86.19 for

history of COVID.

20) We have been coding Z03.818 for all testing w/o an order because we do not know if patient is

asymptomatic or not. You recommend using Z20.828 should we re-code the existing accounts

that have been already done? Also, we are a State Reporting Facility which as I understand we

don't need to require an order. Do you recommend that State Facilities also get orders if

possible?

 I think AHIMA just put out a bulletin regarding using the Z20.828 for pre-op?????

If your facility or type of facility doesn’t require an order, then we don’t recommend getting an

order. As noted in the presentation, the Z03.818 is not appropriate for use in the pandemic, refer

back to the Guideline I.C.21.c.1, in a pandemic everyone is assumed to be exposed. As far as going

back and changing any coding, that would depend on your facility getting denials. If your claims are

being paid, then use the Z20.828 going forward and correct any denials. We have not seen

anything from AHIMA regarding the Z20.828 for pre-op, so if the person who posed this question

has a link to such advice, please forward it our way. 

21) Do you suggest using Z01.818 with Z11.59 for the pre-op testing?

Only if you have an order or script that indicates pre-op testing, there are times that the order or

script indicates the reason for the procedure, so we have seen the reason for the surgery as the

first listed diagnosis.

22) Please clarify coding of "possible COVID” in the OP setting with a positive test result.

The positive test result indicates a COVID infection, so the coding of the U07.1 is the appropriate

code, but with the OP rules about possible diagnoses, the recommendation here would be to code

the U07.1 as the guideline indicates, but also attempt to get the documentation amended for

appropriateness. Another recommendation would be to have registration stop any “possible

COVID” diagnosis and get the documentation corrected on the front end.

23) A patient has tested positive in a different facility prior to admission to my facility. The 

physician documents "patient positive for Covid-19, past 21-day window of being infectious". The

 patient has acute respiratory failure or pneumonia. can I code the U07.1 if the physician does not

specifically link the covid-19 and the current illness or would I use the history code?

As long as the physician states that the patient has confirmed COVID, assign the U07.1, especially in

this instance, it is specific. The history code would be used when there is no longer any active

infection.

24) Screening Code for admission to admit to SNF from IRF? Code for patient that had a Positive DX. at another facility, recovered then has an IRF admission. can I code the U07.1 if the physician does not specifically link the covid-19 and the current illness or would I use the history code?

If the documentation supports that the patient has recovered from COVID-19, then the Z86.19 is

the appropriate code to assign here. If there are residuals, code those conditions. When in doubt

about whether or not the patient has recovered, query the physician.

25) If a patient comes in for lab work and the only lab test ordered is for covid testing and the

diagnosis is for supervision of pregnancy. How would this be coded?

If the patient is positive, assign O98.5- and the U07.1, if the patient is negative, assign the Z code

for the appropriate supervision of pregnancy code, and assign the Z20.828.

26) What E&M type charge should be used when the patients came for covid testing to the ER and were seen briefly in their car?

There would not be an E&M charge here, only the testing codes. Patients being seen for testing in

their cars, are not being evaluated as a patient would be in the ED, office, or clinic setting.

27) If you have covid pneumonia and COPD, do you code the COPD as w/ acute lower respiratory infection?

Yes, follow all appropriate guidelines and instructional notes whether or not the patient has a

COVID infection.

28) Can hospitals bill for CPT 99421-99423? The status indicator is listed as B. Is there a Medicare preferred (G-Code) to use instead or if not chargeable, is there a hospital equivalent code?

This question refers to E-visit codes. E-visits are a communication between a patient and their

provider through an on-line portal. The presentation did note that these codes are for use with

established patients, although in this time of COVID and waivers, new patients can be seen via the

E-visit technology. The codes are for use for the providers; therefore, the hospitals would not

assign these codes for facility billing. There is not an equivalent G code to equate to the 99421-

99423 codes, the G2061-G2063 are for use when qualified non-physician providers can bill for their

services. The status indicator of B means that this service is not paid when the bill type is 12x or

13x – which again are facility bill types.

29) Where was the announcement of the pandemic extension to Oct 23rd, 2020? Did not see this on the CMS website?

To clarify the health emergency declaration is from HHS – which encompasses all of the waivers. In

the presentation, it was noted that the declaration was extended for 90 days – which lands in

October. After looking for a link to share, we found that it is expected to be extended before it

expires on July 25th. On Monday, June 30, 2020, HHS spokesman Michael Caputo tweeted that HHS

intends to extend the COVID-19 public health emergency before it expires on July 25, 2020. Once extended,

the public health emergency will be effective for an additional 90 days. Extending the emergency declaration

will allow providers to continue to use waivers and flexibilities issued to assist them in responding to the

COVID-19 pandemic. Only the WHO (World Health Organization) can declare the pandemic over –

and we are sure that information will come from the WHO and CDC at the appropriate time.

30) How do we code the Antibody testing? How are positive for covid 19 antibodies results coded?

Negative results?

31) Do you code Z0184 as the principle dx, on an outpt lab, if the test is just listed as an antibody test and there is a listed dx?

This answer applies to the two questions above as they are similar: According to the AHA/AHIMA

published FAQ’s, for an encounter for antibody testing that is not being performed to confirm a

current COVID-19 infection, nor is being performed as a follow-up test after resolution of COVID19, assign Z01.84, Encounter for antibody response examination.

If this is an encounter for the testing, the Z01.84 is enough to code, remember the antibody testing

in most circumstances is not being done to confirm a current COVID-19 infection. The positive or

negative results are looking for the antibodies, not the infection.

32)Our facility is sometimes using the test 0202U (22 Target SARS-COV-2). Is this test covered by

Medicare the same as the 87635, 0001U, etc.? Do we apply the CS modifier on the E&M for this

as well?

The specific code 0202U is a PLA code or a Proprietary Lab Analysis Code. PLA codes are a way to

identify a specific lab or manufacturer, these codes are a way to more specifically identify their

testing as opposed to another lab or manufacturer. Many commercial payers require prior

authorization to assess whether medical indications for the procedure were followed by looking at

both the diagnosis and code. Also, note for Medicare, that PLA codes fall into the ABN

authorization, so unless you have a patient sign an ABN for a PLA test, you can’t charge the patient

for it. The CPT Assistant issues for May and June 2020 also have advice on the use of these codes.

The CS modifier should be appended to any service related to COVID-19 testing-related services.

33) Should the CS modifier be placed on testing for pre admission?

The CS modifier should be appended for services furnished on March 18, 2020, and through the

end of the PHE, use the CS modifier on applicable claim lines to identify the service as subject to

the cost-sharing wavier for COVID-19 testing-related services and to get 100% of the Medicareapproved amount:

 Results in the deductible and coinsurance being waived

 Services are medical visits for the E&M categories when an outpatient provider,

physician, or other providers and suppliers billing Medicare for Part B services orders or

administers COVID-19 lab test U0001, U0002, or 87635

The CS modifier does not apply to services unrelated to COVID-19.

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

Coding Guidance-Primary vs Secondary collateral ankle ligament repair

Coding Guidance-Primary vs Secondary collateral ankle ligament repair.


Ask a coder what the difference is between a primary and secondary ankle ligament repair and many will refer you back to the Coder's Desk Reference which indicates a secondary repair occurs a period of time after the initial injury and for the most part, this is true. However, based on information received from the AMA, code selection does not take into consideration the timing of the injury, but rather, how the ligaments were repaired. With a primary repair the ends of the ligaments are brought back together and then sutured to each other. 27695 — Repair, primary, disrupted ligament, ankle, collateral — is reported for this type of repair when it is associated with an acute injury of the ATFL (anterior talofibular ligament) or CFL (calcaneofibular ligament). If both the ATFL and CFL are repaired in an end-to-end fashion then 27696 — both collateral ligaments — would be reported.

Secondary means other tissue is brought in to perform the repair because it's too late to do a primary repair (usually a period of time after the injury). Procedures like Evans, Watson-Jones and Chrisman-Snook are all considered secondary repairs because a proximal portion of the peroneus brevis is released and then passed through drill hole(s) in the fibula and navicular or calcaneal bones to reconstruct the ATFL and/or the CFL. With these types of procedures there is no repair made to the ligament itself.

A physician may perform a direct repair to the ligament(s) (primary) and supplement or reinforce that repair by transferring the extensor retinaculum up over the ligament(s) in what's called a Gould modification(Broström). The AAOS (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons) includes "transfer or mobilization of the adjacent retinaculum" in a primary repair so this should not be additionally reported. Don't confuse the Gould modification with a secondary repair.

In general, when the physician performs a direct repair to the ankle collateral ligaments this would be considered a primary repair regardless of when the injury occurred.

Nasopharyngoscopy With Dilation of Eustachian Tube

  CPT Assistant , April 2021 , Volume 31, Issue 4, page 12 For the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT ® ) code set, two new Category I code...